Compare and Buy Canon 6218B002 Mark II Flatbed Scanner from Staples.com | Staples®
Try our New Site !
Store Locator
Track Order
SEARCH
MAKE more HAPPEN
MAKE more HAPPEN
MAKE more HAPPEN
Close X

New Customer ? Start Here.

 

 New day. New Daily Deals. Get them before they are gone!

WEEKLY AD
Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner

Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner

Item: IM1QV9268    Model: 6218B002

Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner
4.5stars
( 15 reviews)
SHARE:
  • Connect with high-speed USB 2.0
  • 9,600 dpi CCD sensor captures every detail
  • Scans color film and other documents
See more details
  • FREE SHIPPING, Plus up to 5% back for Rewards Members
  • Special Financing Available  Learn More
  • In Stock Online
  • Expected Delivery:3 - 5 Business Days
  • FREE Shipping to store ( Learn More )
  • Online Only
Connect with high-speed USB 2.09,600 dpi CCD sensor captures every detailScans color film and other documentsEachCanon 6218B002 CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner, 9600 dpiConnect with high-speed USB 2.09,600 dpi CCD sensor captures every detailScans color film and other documentsCanon CanoScan 9000F Mark II Flatbed Scanner197.79USDhttp://www.staples-3p.com/s7/is/image/Staples/m001384461_sc7?$std$http://www.staples-3p.com/s7/is/image/Staples/m001384461_sc7?$thb$http://www.staples-3p.com/s7/is/image/Staples/m001384461http://www.staples-3p.com/s7/is/image/Staples/m001384462_sc7?$std$http://www.staples-3p.com/s7/is/image/Staples/m001384462_sc7?$thb$http://www.staples-3p.com/s7/is/image/Staples/m001384462/Canon-6218B002-CanoScan-9000F-Mark-II-Flatbed-Scanner-9600-dpi/product_IM1QV9268
Price:
$197.79
Each

Currently Out of Stock.

Add to Favorites


REVIEW SNAPSHOT®

by PowerReviews
Canon Canoscan 9000F Mark II - Flatbed Scanner - 6218B002
 
4.3

(based on 15 reviews)

Ratings Distribution

  • 5 Stars

     

    (9)

  • 4 Stars

     

    (3)

  • 3 Stars

     

    (2)

  • 2 Stars

     

    (1)

  • 1 Stars

     

    (0)

83%

of respondents would recommend this to a friend.

Pros

  • Great resolution (6)
  • Easy to use (5)
  • Fast connectivity (5)
  • High-speed scanning (4)

Cons

    Best Uses

      Most Helpful Positive Review

       

      Canon 9000F Mark II Scanner

      As any real photographer knows when it comes to equipment, the proof is in the photograph. That being said, the following is a photographer oriented review in that image quality is valued first...Read complete review

      As any real photographer knows when it comes to equipment, the proof is in the photograph. That being said, the following is a photographer oriented review in that image quality is valued first and foremost. I picked up my 9000 F Mark II two days ago and since then I have run a number of real-world tests on it. Unfortunately, I could not compare it to the original 9000 F since I don't have one available, however, my 9000 F Mark II seems to perform better based on the early reviews of the original 9000 F. I'll speak to that momentarily, but keep in mind that I cannot really account for the validity of anyone else's results. So in fact, there may be indeed be no difference in image quality between recent manufacturers of the two models. This is a summary of what I did found on the Mark II: Regarding Platen use with flat documents and photographs, I found the scanner to be very fast, and it produced excellent quality in terms of color accuracy and neutrality. In fact, after profiling it with two different IT8 targets using third-party software I found that all this resulted in was a loss of color neutrality and an exaggeration of contrast, which I really didn't care for on either count. In reality, the Canon ScanGear software produced the best results and was much easier to work with. At 300 dpi with 48 bit color it averaged around 9 seconds for an A4 size document and it produced a 51 MB Tiff file, which I found to be more than adequate for PDFs that were much better than than my MX870 or Lide600F. At 600 dpi it took 26 seconds to produce a 48 bit 102 MB Tiff file that would be better for larger reproductions. At 1200 dpi it took 1 min. and 44 seconds to produce a 409 MB 48 bit Tiff file that was, very critically speaking, sharper than the 600 dpi scan, however, you have to uncheck the thumbnail view in ScanGear to do this and you would never be able to tell the difference on an 8 x 10 anyway. So I'm going with 600 dpi as a standard for photographs, because frankly there's no good reason for more especially when you just start to see ink jet patterns and minute dust, aside from simple fact that a 102 MB file doesn't take a supercomputer linked to server farms for storage, unlike the 409 MB 1200 dpi files when things begin to add up. Film Scanning After a number of tests I found that 2400 dpi resulted in the sharpest scans, which may not seem to make sense at first but it was true nevertheless. Even with FARE Medium enabled it only took an average of 1 min. and 30 seconds on Kodachrome to produce a 40 MB 48 bit Tiff file. Increasing the resolution to 4800 dpi or 9600 dpi was a real loser on three fronts. First the sharpness got progressively worse at these "higher dpi settings", the times increased dramatically, as well as the file sizes, which reached an absurd 625 MB 48 bit Tiff, again with fare enabled. So 2400 dpi with FARE enabled (which did not effect the sharpness) was the winner! While again I couldn't compare the film performance with the 9000 F original I was able to compare it to my older dedicated film scanner the CanoScan FS4000US, which could only be used with third-party software and produced considerably more noise. In terms of resolution though the dedicated film scanner was better, although it wasn't very noticeable on 4 x 6 prints and took a good deal of advanced Photoshop techniques to fully utilize. So for smaller print reproductions, speed (1 min. 30 seconds compared to 8 min. 30 seconds on the old film scanner) and the color quality of the color negative scans I'll definitely use my 9000 F Mark II for archiving and cataloging and when I have one of those well-crafted images that I want to print large I'll simply rescan on the film scanner, which by the way is not supported on the newer operating systems unless you purchase third-party software that includes its own drivers. In conclusion, I am really happy with the scanner at least partially because I didn't expect magical results on critically high quality film images. As I mentioned earlier, even though I could not compare it to the original 9000 F I did not find any problems whatsoever in terms of overall image quality and ease-of-use based on my real-world tests, in fact I found that the new ScanGear produced excellent color overall and particularly with regard to color negatives. This differs from what some earlier reviews of the original 9000 F claimed to be issues. Even for film scans I found that the quality was really not an issue unless you're going 8 x 10 or larger with a really good original. Hope this helps.

      VS

      Most Helpful Negative Review

       

      Should also have hoders to scan 126 negatives and

      There was a lot of 126 and 110 film sold in the past that I would like to scan. I like the resolution of this scanner but I can't scan my files of 126...Read complete review

      There was a lot of 126 and 110 film sold in the past that I would like to scan. I like the resolution of this scanner but I can't scan my files of 126 and 110 negatives as there is no provision for it in the hardware or the software. Get with it Canon.

      Reviewed by 15 customers

      Sort by

      Displaying reviews 1-5

      Back to top

      Previous | Next »

       
      5.0

      Canon Scanner 9000F

      By Alan

      from Succasunna, New Jersey

      Verified Buyer

      Pros

        Cons

          Best Uses

            Comments about Canon Canoscan 9000F Mark II - Flatbed Scanner - 6218B002:

            I have not had the scanner for very long, but it seems to be working great! I tried scanning pictures, slides, and negatives, and all the results were very good. Pictures come out clearer, and sharper. I noticed that the scanner is so sensitive on negatives and slides, that you may want to dust small particles off, before scanning. Also, the software will take old pictures that are cloudy and somewhat fuzzy, and actually sharpen them up. For the price, this scanner seems to be a very good value for storing photo media.

            • Are you connected to this product in any way?:
            • I am an employee or otherwise affiliated with the brand.

            Comment on this review(earn points)

            (0 of 2 customers found this review helpful)

             
            4.0

            Nice looking scanner

            By Hartless

            from Colorado

            Comments about Canon Canoscan 9000F Mark II - Flatbed Scanner - 6218B002:

            I look forward to learning how to run the scanner! I know why there was no printed documentation that came with the machine. 500 plus pages online. I generally print all manuals but not this one. Still looking for the quick start manual so I can start to scan some slides I took in Vietnam, Hong Kong, and Sydney back in 1968. Check back when I learn more about the Canon CanoScan 9000F Mark II.

            Comment on this review(earn points)

             
            5.0

            Great Product, Great Price!

            By CoachVT

            from NOVA

            Comments about Canon Canoscan 9000F Mark II - Flatbed Scanner - 6218B002:

            This is an excellent product on the hardware side, but lacks a bit of ease of use on the software side. Luckily, you can use your own software and leave theirs on the disc. Overall great product with an exceptional price. Scanners have come a LONG way since 1980!

            Comment on this review(earn points)

             
            5.0

            Canon Canoscan 9000F Mark II - Scanner

            By barbe2700

            from Havertown, PA

            Verified Buyer
            This customer has reached Intern level on the Staples.com Leaderboard

            Comments about Canon Canoscan 9000F Mark II - Flatbed Scanner - 6218B002:

            So far so good! Great scanner! Quick, easy to setup and very easy to use. Scans photos beautifully. Have not tried to scan negatives and slides yet. Can't wait to try as it can scan a lot at one time. Will update my review after doing so. Software program is easy to use with lots of features. Canon is a trustworthy name and this scanner shows it. Nice design, easy to use buttons, hinged lid allows for copying or scanning bulky items such as books. Great automatic features to ensure a nice, clean copy or scan of your photos. Would recommend this scanner.

            Comment on this review(earn points)

             
            5.0

            Fantastic scanner / great value!!

            By macB

            from Tennessee

            Comments about Canon Canoscan 9000F Mark II - Flatbed Scanner - 6218B002:

            The CanoScan 9000F Mark II is everything it is advertised to be plus, I have hundreds of pictures, slides and negitives to copy onto my computer. The unit has worked faithfully and very cleanly. Easy to operate, easy to understand functions and just a pleasure to do the needed jobs I need it to accomplish. Thanks for a great scanner, macB

            Comment on this review(earn points)

            Displaying reviews 1-5

            Back to top

            Previous | Next »

            Deals! Get them now
            SUBMIT
            Join us on: