Skip to main content
Skip to footer

Customer Reviews for Fellowes Thermal Laminating Pouches, Letter Size, 10 Mil, 50/Pack (52042)

Fellowes Thermal Laminating Pouches, Letter Size, 10 Mil, 50/Pack (52042)~#|#~sp40321998_sc7
Fellowes Thermal Laminating Pouches, Letter Size, 10 Mil, 50/Pack (52042)~#|#~sp40321992_sc7
Item # : 806271
Model # : 52042
Get heavy-duty protection for papers by using this 50-pack Fellowes letter-size 10-mil glossy thermal laminating pouches.
  • Thermal laminating pouches protect documents you handle frequently
  • Measures 9"W x 11.5"L and has 10 mil thickness
Price is $43.39
Unit of measure 50/Pack Price per unit $0.87/Pouch
Free Next-Day eligible by tomorrow
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Over 30
4.4
14 reviews
5 star
71%
4 star
14%
3 star
7%
2 star
0%
1 star
7%
Most helpful positive review
Posted Jan 2, 2015
thick clear sheets
The Fellowes letter size 10 Mil is a superb way to preserve documents posters, and photos. Its thickness and clarity offer an excellent presentation tool and substitute for frames. It is an excellent covering for postcards and preserving old documents and newspaper articles. Having used 3 mil laminating sheets for many years for cards and labels, I always found them to ...
Read full review
VS
Most helpful critical review
Posted Apr 18, 2016
Laminating pouches
Horrible! Kept getting air pockets and would not stay together.
Most recent reviews
MM
Reviewed at:
Staples Advantage
Posted Nov 8, 2019
Great
Thermal pouches are great.
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
LINDA D.
Verified Buyer
Posted Aug 21, 2017
Fellowes Laminating Purches
Good quality
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
RebeccaMace
Reviewed at:
Staples Advantage
Posted Aug 22, 2016
Laminating Pouches
These are exactly what they say, very heavy duty and work well for outside use.
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
CarlaMilljour
Reviewed at:
Staples Advantage
Posted May 16, 2016
Extra Heavy-Duty Hot Laminating Pouches
They work great
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
Love G.
Verified Buyer
Posted May 6, 2016
the srvices i received was
the srvices i received was perfect
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
TerriYoung
Reviewed at:
Staples Advantage
Posted Apr 18, 2016
Laminating pouches
Horrible! Kept getting air pockets and would not stay together.
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
Paul Jankiewicz
Verified Buyer
Posted Jan 2, 2015
thick clear sheets
The Fellowes letter size 10 Mil is a superb way to preserve documents posters, and photos. Its thickness and clarity offer an excellent presentation tool and substitute for frames. It is an excellent covering for postcards and preserving old documents and newspaper articles. Having used 3 mil laminating sheets for many years for cards and labels, I always found them to ...
Read full review
1up votes 1
0down votes 0
Report
ronnie
Verified Buyer
Posted Dec 5, 2014
Clear as Glass
Works just like it is supposed to. No lumps or bubbles.
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
ROSIE
Verified Buyer
Posted Jan 10, 2014
Heavy, durable, clear results
Good for company ID cards, luggage tags, to display notices that need to last, outdoor signs.
Easy to load and laminate, clear results with very few air bubbles.
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
IWRC
Posted Oct 17, 2013
Lovely Product
Great
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
LC
Verified Buyer
Posted Apr 4, 2013
10 mil pouch
I used these to make some signs for a trade show. The signs were really nice looking with the 10 mil sheet; they looked more professionally done by using the heavy sheet. Very easy to use. I would recommend if you are doing something that needs to look professional or might be getting a lot of use.
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
nuage
Verified Buyer
Posted Jul 19, 2012
great product
I use it to make bookmark.
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
Tank Man
Verified Buyer
Posted Nov 9, 2010
Fellowes Laminating letter pouches
Not as convenient to use as the similar product from GBC. The Fellows brand open from the narrow end, while the GBC brand opens from the wide side.
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report