Customer Reviews for HP Scanjet Pro 3000 s4 Duplex Desktop Document Scanner, White (6FW07A#BGJ)
23 reviews
Most helpful positive review
Posted Sep 7, 2024
Fast and reliable
Fast and reliable
VS
Most helpful critical review
Posted Dec 10, 2020
It is not working!
I bought it 2 weeks ago. The tech. Dept of your company worked over 3 hours on it but it still did not work. So the man told me to let you know that it is a bad product. So l need to return it to your company
Baudwalker
Verified Buyer
Reviewed at:
store.hp.com
Posted Sep 7, 2024
Fast and reliable
Fast and reliable
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
cbfh
Verified Buyer
Reviewed at:
hp.com
Posted Nov 18, 2023
Awesome
works great easy to use
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
REDVAXIN PRIVATE LIMITED.
Verified Buyer
Reviewed at:
store.hp.com
Posted Sep 25, 2023
PRODUCT REVIEW
BEST PRODUCT
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
Bethany O.
Verified Buyer
Reviewed at:
hp.com
Posted Feb 22, 2023
Super fast scanner, small footprint
Super fast and small footprint. I will use this for traveling.
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
IG Wealth
Verified Buyer
Reviewed at:
staples.ca
Posted Dec 1, 2021
worth the extra $
excellent scanner, remember you get what you pay for...
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
Ezekiel T
This reviewer received a free product or coupon in exchange for an unbiased review of the product
Reviewed at:
hp.com
Posted Mar 16, 2021
Quick and Clear
Ordered from our Vendor Royal Business Systems and just wow! The machine met all our expectations.
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
HP ScanJet Pro 3000 s4 sc
Verified Buyer
Reviewed at:
hp.com
Posted Dec 10, 2020
It is not working!
I bought it 2 weeks ago. The tech. Dept of your company worked over 3 hours on it but it still did not work. So the man told me to let you know that it is a bad product. So l need to return it to your company
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
Angela C
Verified Buyer
Reviewed at:
hp.com
Posted Jul 29, 2020
Fast and Efficient
Love this scanner. It is fast and efficient. It gets the job done.
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report