Skip to main content
Skip to footer

Customer Reviews for PPR INKJT MATTE DBL WT

PPR INKJT MATTE DBL WT
Item # : 821003
Model # : EPSS041387
Epson® Double Weight Matte Paper features a flat matte surface to eliminate glare. Dries instantly and is ideal for easy handling with Epson® inks. It has high color gamut and is easy to laminate.
  • 44"(W) x 82'(L)
  • Finish: Matte
Price is $136.59
Unit of measure Roll
Free delivery by Thu, Jul 03
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Over 30
4
2 reviews
5 star
50%
4 star
0%
3 star
50%
2 star
0%
1 star
0%
Most helpful positive review
Posted May 28, 2014
Great for framing & high-end presentatio
Epson semi-glossy photo paper is pricey, but for photos you plan to frame, or for doing a really impressive high-end presentation, there's nothing like it. Enough of a sheen to give the picture depth, but not so much that there's glare on it. What I especially like about all Epson papers (when used with an Epson printer) is that they don't ever smudge.
Most recent reviews
Richard Atlas. Bottfeld
Reviewed at:
Staples Advantage
Posted Oct 3, 2014
title is good
The product, the glossy paper. Is slightly thin for my purposes. I need a thicker ,heavier paper with guarantees that, if used with the proper inks it will last for one hundred years without fading. I sometimes order my frames from Staples.com And I can rely upon them to get my products out to me quickly and securely with no extra cost because I am a member of staples.c...
Read full review
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
J Davis
Reviewed at:
Staples Advantage
Posted May 28, 2014
Great for framing & high-end presentatio
Epson semi-glossy photo paper is pricey, but for photos you plan to frame, or for doing a really impressive high-end presentation, there's nothing like it. Enough of a sheen to give the picture depth, but not so much that there's glare on it. What I especially like about all Epson papers (when used with an Epson printer) is that they don't ever smudge.
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report