Skip to main content
Skip to footer
Accessibility Commitment

Customer Reviews for HP 506L Cyan High Yield Toner Cartridge, Prints Up to 3,500 Pages (SU042A)

HP 506L Cyan High Yield Toner Cartridge, Prints Up to 3,500 Pages (SU042A)~#|#~2FBB17C2-EFB5-47DA-8C2FBA8090525618_sc7
Item # : 949906
Model # : SU042A
Get high-quality results for important prints by using this Samsung 506 high-yield cyan toner cartridge.
  • HP 506L toner cartridges work with: Samsung CLP-680DW, CLP-680ND, CLX-6260FD, CLX-6260FR, CLX-6260FW, CLX-6260ND
  • Cartridge Yield (approx.): 3,500 pages.
  • Color: Cyan
Price is $182.89
Free delivery by Fri, Nov 07
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Over 30
4.26
27 reviews
5 star
67%
4 star
11%
3 star
7%
2 star
11%
1 star
4%
Most helpful positive review
Posted Sep 1, 2020
Samsung Yellow Toner Y506L
Long lasting hi yield toner - great value for the price.
VS
Most helpful critical review
Posted May 30, 2018
Overrated
I have been using these for a while. The # of copies you suggest is misleading.
Most recent reviews
PAMELA B.
Posted Sep 1, 2020
Samsung Yellow Toner Y506L
Long lasting hi yield toner - great value for the price.
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
D.R.
Posted Apr 6, 2020
Overpriced
Excellent quality; very overpriced. I'd consider ge eric alternatives.
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
D.R.
Posted Apr 5, 2020
Samsung quality but very high price
The price to replace all four toner cartridges is extremel pricey: exorbitantly so. Perhaps it makes more sense to consider generic alternatives.
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
FRANCISCO
Posted Sep 5, 2018
Nice ink
Great toner just very very pricy !
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
R.D.
Posted Jul 27, 2018
very poor performance
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
S.M.
Posted Jun 20, 2018
Samsung Toner
I have always used Samsung printer toner. It is the best product I have found.
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
J.D.
Posted May 30, 2018
Overrated
I have been using these for a while. The # of copies you suggest is misleading.
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report