Customer Reviews for Great Papers® Holiday Card Address Labels Ginger Friends, 150/Count
Item # : 958149
Model # : 2011600
Great Papers® Ginger friends address label with festive design adds elegance to your letter.
- Individual label size: 2.625" x 1"
- 8.5" x 11" sheet size
Price is $10.09
Unit of measure 150/Pack
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
Over 30
7 reviews
Most helpful positive review
Posted Nov 24, 2015
Xmas Labels
These worked fine and are reasonably priced.
NANCY V.
Verified Buyer
Posted Mar 8, 2025
Holiday Card Address Labels
I love them and a great price!
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
SHIRLEY M.
Verified Buyer
Posted Jan 14, 2025
Holiday Address LLabels
Looks very sturdy and perfect for the holidays
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
Staples Customer
Verified Buyer
Posted Nov 15, 2023
Labels
Beautiful Christmas labels
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
Wilson F.
Verified Buyer
Posted Nov 24, 2015
Xmas Labels
These worked fine and are reasonably priced.
1up votes 1
0down votes 0
Report
Maryann S.
Verified Buyer
Posted Sep 13, 2015
Perfet!
The Great Papers® Ginger Friends Address Labels, 2.625 x 1 wee perfect. I am recently handicapped an wanted to an address-book - I purchased a Rolodex from Staples and put all my addresses ,numbers & email addresses from little pieces of paper to the Great Papers® Ginger Friends Address Labels, 2.625 x 1 then stuck them on the Rolodex cards - PERFECT! And Avery prov...
Read full review
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
TN
Verified Buyer
Posted Jan 2, 2015
Cute!
Very cure labels.
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report
Lisa
Verified Buyer
Posted Oct 24, 2014
Beautiful labels
Each year my organization gives out of 3500 toys for Christmas. We've always made up our own labels but after blowing out a printer last year and using so much ink we decided it was actually cheaper to purchase labels and use them. Took a "committee" to decide if these labels would work for that project. The problem was making sure they had enough because we didn't want...
Read full review
0up votes 0
0down votes 0
Report